CHICAGO – Seventy-eight percent of Americans favor the use of electronic medical records, according to a recent study by NORC at the University of Chicago, an independent research organization.

The study was published in the February edition of the journal HSR: Health Services Research.

Researchers say this report is different because most previous studies of EMRs have focused on the attitudes of clinicians or health organizations. Surprisingly few have focused on the attitudes of consumers toward health IT and, of those, none were based on a sample that fully represents the American people.

Key findings of the study are:

• Fifty-nine percent believe EMRs could reduce health costs
• Seventy-two percent support sharing of health care information among providers
• Eighty percent favored use of e-prescribing
• Seventy-nine percent thought that personal health records would help patients to be better informed about their health.
• Despite the fact that 48 percent of Americans are concerned about the privacy of medical records, fully 64 percent said that the benefits of EMRs outweigh privacy concerns
• The study also found that Americans aren’t without their reservations. Forty-four percent said they are not willing to pay to increase the use of health IT, and 57 percent said that use of health IT would make no difference in their choice of a physician.

Individuals with lower income and those who have less familiarity with electronic technology have less favorable attitudes towards health IT, the study found. Researchers say this implies that some of the populations that are most likely to benefit from health IT may be least open-minded about it.

“Our core finding is that a large majority of Americans support use of health IT to improve healthcare and safety, and reduce costs, which suggests that government and industry efforts to increase the effectiveness and use of health IT are generally consistent with the public’s wishes,” said Dan Gaylin, NORC’s executive vice president for Research, and the lead author of the study. “But there is still room for efforts to demonstrate the advantages of health IT among some important demographic groups.”

Source   :    http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/study-most-americans-support-emrs

Patient-centered medical homes have become all the rage in the healthcare industry these days. The big push is coming from payers who want to cut costs and provider organizations who want primary care physicians to have a bigger say in the care of their patients. No matter who is driving the financial and clinical model, the train isn’t leaving the station, so to speak, without health IT to power it.

At a primary-care practice in St. Louis, Mo., both patients and their families are seeing firsthand how an electronic medical record system documents patient treatment and applies clinical decision support and analytics to tailor a patient’s treatment plan.

PCMHs are not all the same, and the Des Peres Internal Medicine office further personalizes treatment by having a nurse practitioner and social worker as part of the PCMH team. One of the Des Peres Internal Medicine physicians said that one of the goals of the PCMH is to increase patient access to care. That could mean access to the social worker via telephone. It also gives patients the extra channel of communicating or completing tasks such as making an appointment, filling a prescription or entering patient vitals via a patient portal.

One of the best benefits of an EMR in a PCMH is the streamlining of care delivery, which includes the elimination of duplicative tests. Most patients in a PCMH likely have multiple chronic conditions that a care team must manage. If patients see multiple specialists on their own, who is coordinating the care? Even if the coordination is done through a primary-care physician, without an EMR to aggregate data and document what happens in every specialist office, the amount of administrative and clinical paperwork would be overwhelming.

Another benefit is empowering patients, which can often translate into taking better care of themselves, especially when they have their up-to-date patient information available to them via the patient portal and clinical decision support and analytics to support their entire care team.

Source     :     http://www.healthcareitnews.com/blog/patient-centered-medical-home-requires-emr-system

Government incentives for using electronic medical records will result in spending on systems doubling by 2015, according to a report by IDC Health Insights. However, the study notes that much of that growth will come closer to end of that projected period, because vendors are having trouble keeping up with the orders.

Total EMR spending, which is expected to grow from $1.9 billion in 2009 to $3.8 billion by 2015, is about twice the growth rate analysts are seeing over the health information technology market and the general IT market, said Judy Hanover, research director of provider IT strategies for the Framingham, Mass.-based market research company and co-author of the report.

The report notes that a separate IDC survey in August 2010 found that 44% of health care organizations plan to accelerate or aggressively accelerate their plans to deploy EMRs because of financial incentives in the 2009 economic stimulus package. The stimulus provided incentives of up to $44,000 under Medicare and nearly $64,000 under Medicaid for meaningful use of an EMR.

But this rapid deployment is causing a vendor backlog that has resulted in unanticipated delays of up to six months for some practices and hospitals. Hanover said this has been a bigger issue for inpatient system deployments, but analysts are starting to see it on the ambulatory side as well.

The authors of the report predicted that the largest chunk of EMR investments will come in 2015. Not only is the backlog expected to cause delays, but some physicians will put off purchasing until it gets closer to 2015, when incentives turn to penalties.

The forecast shows clinics and physician practices will spend $335 million on EMRs in 2011 and $490 million in 2015. Ambulatory EMR spending overall was $633 million in 2009 and is expected to reach $1.4 billion in 2015.

Making an early decision on an EMR will help ensure that staff members are available for its installation, Hanover said. Practices might want to consider looking at third-party vendors if their primary vendors are experiencing a backlog, she said. Many third parties can provide installation and training services with the help of the vendor, she said.

After 2015, vendors are expected to enter a “maintenance cycle” in which revenue will come mostly from replacement systems or upgrades. Not only could the government require EMRs to perform more functions than they do today to qualify for incentives, health system reform may have an impact.

“We do expect to see, as health care reform goes into effect, a massive consolidation in the provider community in terms of acquisitions and reductions in the total number of providers,” Hanover said. “And that will drive some replacements and upgrading and reinvestment in EMRs.”

Source    :    http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2011/01/31/bisd0201.htm